#SEJSummit NYC Recap: SEO, AMP, Psychology, & Content Marketing by @wonderwall7

Check out the latest in SEO, AMP, and more from SEJ Summit NYC 2016.

The post #SEJSummit NYC Recap: SEO, AMP, Psychology, & Content Marketing by @wonderwall7 appeared first on Search Engine Journal.

SearchCap: Yandex Palekh algorithm, Yext reviews & more search

Below is what happened in search today, as reported on Search Engine Land and from other places across the web.

The post SearchCap: Yandex Palekh algorithm, Yext reviews & more search appeared first on Search Engine Land.



Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.

Amazon Fire HD 8 Review: When 'good enough' is a great deal

Tablets are the middleman of technology – not as essential as our phones, but not as powerful as our computers. While devices like the Surface Pro and iPad Pro have focused on maximized productivity -, and come with price tags to match – chances are most people use their tablets for watching videos and reading books. Those are precisely the people Amazon is targeting with it's new Fire HD 8 tablet at. At $89, it offers a heck of a lot of tablet for a low price. First off, the specs to keep in mind 8 inch screen 1200 X…

This story continues at The Next Web

Brian Clark on the Getting Goosebumps Podcast

On this episode of Elsewhere, Brian Clark and Bryan Adams chat about content marketing, storytelling, and the importance of reverse-engineering your audience.

In this 57-minute episode, Brian and Bryan discuss:

• The influence of Copyblogger


• Who make the best storytellers?


• Reverse engineering your audience


• Timeless storytellers vs. modern-day speakers

Listen to this Episode Now

The post Brian Clark on the Getting Goosebumps Podcast appeared first on Copyblogger.

The 4-Step Plan to Construct Your Own Keyword-to-URL Map

Posted by Carson-Ward

Knowing how to find and effectively use keywords is probably the most important skill for an effective search marketer. Smart keyword planning and tracking should also heavily inform content planning and strategy. Unfortunately, most keyword research is done on the fly as a new page is created. Rather than helping marketers find new opportunities and plan strategically, keywords are usually found and applied to existing posts and in-flight projects.

If you're an SEO or content creator and don't have a living, regularly referenced keyword map, this post is for you. We won't discuss how to optimize existing pages. There are lots of well-done technical SEO posts around if the optimization process is new to you. But if the concept of a keyword plan is new to you, this post should walk you through the process completely. If you're experienced, you'll probably pick up at least one new trick or application for keywords.

If you'd like to follow along with a keyword research template I've created, feel free to make a copy of this Google doc. You'll see images of it throughout the post that might make more sense if you open it up.

Finding and selecting keywords

Obviously the first step to using keywords is finding what people search for. While thorough and hopefully helpful, there's nothing shocking or ground-breaking in this first section. The real magic is in how you use your keywords.

---

Step 1: Build the “Big List”

Your goal in this first phase of keyword research is to gather every keyword that your business would want to appear for. You won't achieve that goal, but set your sights high. Think outside the structure of your current site. Look beyond keywords you currently rank for and knowingly compete for.

Moz Keyword Explorer

Moz's Keyword Explorer is a great tool, and I'm not just saying that because of Moz's resident hypnotist. I must have missed its launch somehow, yet it's quickly become my first stop for collecting lots of keywords quickly. The grouping function is great for finding head terms, and the sub-terms will be useful later on in either optimizing terms on existing pages or finding related pages worth creating.

Here I'm using the Moz keyword tool and excluding very low-volume keyword terms that I know I'll be ignoring. Throughout this post I'm using our site, HighSpeedInternet.com, as an example.

Put in your known head terms and export them all using the “Export CSV” function. I'm impressed by the speed of the tool, and often use volume filters to avoid exporting terms I won't actually use. That might sound small, but many tools force large exports prior to any estimation of search volume. Once you're done gathering and exporting, you can remove duplicates and sort using Excel or a (slightly clumsier) Google Sheets script.

SearchMetrics

SearchMetrics is good for those who aren't sure which keywords they want to rank for. We'll need to input competitors' sites to find keywords. For those who don't know who competitors are, there's a handy tool that shows likely candidates under “SEO research > Competitors.”

SimilarWeb (not shown) is also helpful in checking for competitors. If your site is new, simply plug in some of the queries you'd like to rank for and look those sites up. Once you've discovered some competitors, throw them into SearchMetrics and head over to the “Rankings” section under “SEO Research” and click “Long Tail.”

If this were a competitor's site, I'd see a list of keywords they rank for and the potential traffic.

Other tools

• SEMrush has a tool that can find keywords with search volume by site or related terms. One of the better all-in-one tools for keyword research.


• UberSuggest spits out tons of related terms. It's no longer a favorite, as many have found suggestions to be irrelevant or low-volume terms.


• KeywordTool.io is a good complement to a more full-featured tool. It's reliably better than most tools at finding mid-tail terms that others don't find.


• Google Keyword Planner offers free suggestions. One major downside is that your competitors will probably be using the tool the same way you do, resulting in lots of competition for the more narrow set of terms that Google suggests. Still, it would be fine to use this tool and nothing else if your tools budget is low.

There's an almost unlimited number of keyword tools, but you really only need one or two. The more thorough your Big List process is, the more work you'll save yourself later on. It's usually worth it to spend a day or two gathering lots of keywords for a site you'll be working on regularly.

---

Step 2: Get keyword volume

Use Excel's handy function or a Google Sheets script to remove duplicate keywords. For most of us the next step is to import/paste sets of keywords into the Google Keyword Planner, export the volume, and repeat. There's a limit to how many keywords Google will allow you to run at one time, so pre-filtering bad keywords might be a good idea. For example, I often pull out competitors' branded terms.

Work-around for “low-volume” accounts (+extra precision)

Google recently continued its creeping war against those who use Google products for free by returning ranges in the keyword planner for low-spending accounts. These ranges (as in the image below) are so broad they're essentially useless for anything but pre-filtering.

To get around this limit, you can just click the nice “Add to plan” button on any one of your terms.

If you're only curious about volume for a few keywords, you can just click the “Add to plan” button for multiple terms. It's easier to paste them in the next step for larger lists. Once you've added at least one keyword, click the “Review plan” button.

Now you're on a new page where you'll need to be careful about avoiding the “Save to account” buttons unless you actually want to start bidding. Click “Add keywords” to paste your terms in, then save it to a new ad group.

Now click the ad group. You'll see a large table that's mostly blank. Fill in a $999 bid and set the range to monthly. I also like to try different match types, but I typically use exact-match.

So why is this cool?

• Impression count is more accurate, and not rounded like in the regular tool.


• You can set custom date ranges if you want a more accurate figure for forecasting purposes.


• You can play with match type again (which is something Google took away from the standard planner interface).


• It works for free accounts.

At the end of Step 2, you should have a simple two-column list.

---

Step 3: Filter keywords

Notice I said we should filter keywords - not delete them. You'll generally want to break keywords into three groups:

1.) Priority terms: Keywords you want to rank for immediately. A good priority term has the following attributes:

• Related to current and near-future business


• Implies a question you can answer well about a product you sell, OR implies a need you can fulfill


• High-enough volume to be worth the investment

2.) Secondary terms: We'll want to go after these some day, but not before we have our priority keywords locked in with query-responsive, well-optimized pages. Secondary terms usually have the following traits:

• Doesn't have buying intent, but has healthy volume and relates to what your site does


• Implies a question you don't have the expertise to answer


• Low-volume terms that might convert

3.) Other terms: You might lay out some tertiary keywords (i.e those where you plan to expand the business), but you can generally stop there and label any others as keywords to “ignore for now.”

You'll usually want to note why you are or are not pursuing a term so you don't have to re-evaluate it every time you look for new keywords. Step three's endpoint just adds a few columns:

---

Using keywords effectively

Now that you've gathered keywords it's time to figure out how to use them. Your ultimate goals are to 1) find new opportunities on existing pages, and 2) find keywords for which you don't have a good landing page so that you can create or suggest a useful new piece of content. Before we can do either, we'll need to map the keywords to pages on your site.

---

Step 4: Map priority keywords

Just like you needed human judgment to determine priority keywords, you'll need to use good judgment to map them to pages. You can skip the judgment steps and still come out with a final product, but it will ultimately be far less useful. Besides, this is why we have jobs that machines won't be taking over for a while.

Scrape Google

First, scrape Google for your keywords and current ranking. Google frowns on rank tracking and SERP scraping, but consider it fair game for all the content they scrape and save. If you don't want to scrape SERPs you can manually map each page, but it's nice for larger sites to check yes/no rather than thinking through a list of potential pages every time.

There are tons of tools and services for this. AWR is probably the most common choice, as this is a one-time deal. You could also write a simple script with proxies or find a freelancer on one of a dozen sites. Moz Pro's campaigns work up to your keyword limit, but the Moz tool is far better at helping after you've mapped keywords.

Mapping new & existing URLs

Once you have each keyword's page and current rank, you'll want to quickly check that the page matches the query.

• How does this page help the user? (Don't confuse this with what the user does next.)


• Would the ideal version of that page do what you'd want if you typed this keyword into Google?


• Would a page about this keyword or set of keywords only serve the query better?

You don't want to create new pages for every tiny keyword variation, but we do want to make sure the page feels tailored to the user question. You're trying to close the gap between what people want from Google and what your site does, so it shouldn't be surprising if the questions you ask yourself feel UX-heavy.

After asking these questions a few hundred times it'll become second nature. You won't rank at all for some terms, so you'll have to either manually select a page or create a new one. For some pages (especially those 50+), Google will just be plain wrong and you'll have to re-map them.

The hardest choice is often whether an existing page could be optimized to be a better fit, or if a new URL is more appropriate. As a general rule, anything that would augment an existing page's core purpose can be added, but anything that would detract or confuse the core purpose should be placed elsewhere. Don't worry if it's not immediately clear what the core purpose of the page is. Part of the value in this process is refining page purpose with keywords.

If you have a page in the top 5 or 10, it's usually best to assume optimizing the page is a better path than creating a new page. If you have sets of conflicting keywords (meaning optimizing for both confuses the page) ranking on the same URL, you can generally choose the higher-value terms and then link to a new page about the second set.

For example, if we had a page appearing for “internet providers by zip code” and “satellite internet providers,” these would be considered conflicting. Trying to talk about satellite Internet (which is available almost everywhere) and zip code-specific Internet at the same time would be confusing. We'd create a new page for satellite Internet, delete the existing satellite Internet content, and link to the new page from the ranking URL.

Building new pages

If you've identified new pages that have opportunity, well done! Ensure that the amount of effort is worth the reward, and utilize the opportunities in your production process. Keyword research done well comes with a built-in business case. If you can show keyword volume and argue for keyword intent, you only have to make some assumptions on click, call, or purchase rates to put a potential dollar figure on the project.

Once you've mapped keywords to a new page, you should also have scope settled at a high level. Knowing what questions you're trying to answer and what the page should do gives everyone the information they need to contribute and determine the best way to build it.

Optimizing existing pages

Improving existing pages is usually easier and less time-intensive, but don't simply optimize page titles and call it a day. Actually look at the page and determine whether it's a good fit for what you'd want to see if you were the one Googling. Also consider the competition and aim to be better.

There will be a larger list of existing terms ranking below the top spot where optimization and improvement need to be prioritized. Here are a couple examples of prioritization helpers:

• Keyword opportunity: Find a click-through study, estimate the traffic you're getting in your current position, and estimate how much traffic you'd get from the top spot. Consider both keywords and pages.


• Competitive opportunity: Combine the opportunity above with competition metrics (e.g. PA/DA in the SERPs).


• Crawl your pages to get titles and content, break the keyword into its individual words, and see how many of the words appear.

Use these figures as guides, and be smart about competition. It's easy for analytical people to get too deep into a spreadsheet. Make sure you're looking at your website and that of your competition, rather than making decisions on a pet formula alone.

---

A word to skeptical content strategists/marketers

I understand if you think this looks like a post for SEOs. Content that comes from highly searched keywords tends to be evergreen, but the result of writing keyword-targeting content is rarely something your visitors will rush to share. It's very rarely inspiring, timely, fun, or otherwise sexy. Keep some things in mind, though:

1. Depending on who you believe, organic traffic on average is 2–4x average referral traffic across the web. Don't sell yourself short with a content strategy that only reaches half of your potential audience.


2. You don't have to create content the way everyone else has. In fact, please don't! See a bunch of dull articles ranking for the term? Maybe make it an interactive tool. Write something that's not dull. Answer the question better than anyone else has.


3. You'll drive more sales creating good content for boring searches than you will creating viral posts that get shared and linked to. Combine keyword hunting with shareable content for a truly business-changing organic/inbound strategy.

You don't need an SEO's permission to create useful content for things Google explicitly tells you your potential fans and customers are looking for. Incorporating a keyword strategy into a comprehensive content strategy almost feels like cheating.

---

Getting started: A spreadsheet template

If all of this sounds a bit overwhelming, I've created a template in Google docs that you can begin using. Just choose “File > Make a copy,” read through the comments, and start entering in your own data once you feel comfortable.

Get your keyword mapping template

The Google doc does a lot of the boring stuff for you, like calculating keyword opportunity, title optimization (if you put in page titles), and organizing your keyword map by page and keyword with opportunity, volume, and more.

---

When it's time to automate

There are tools for doing much of what this spreadsheet does. The right tool will be worth the money as long as you keep some things in mind before you dive in and start paying:

1. It's wise to know what you want a tool to do before buying it. Use the keyword mapping template, experiment with what you actually want and use regularly, and then you can start looking for tools to help you map keywords and optimize pages. Avoid tool clutter by using them deliberately.


2. Most tools will try to map keywords to pages, but none can reliably tell you when or how you should create new content. If you're never actually looking at keywords with human judgment and asking, “Am I answering that query?”, then you're probably over-relying on the tool.

For Moz Pro members, plugging in some keywords and playing around is a great place to start. Play around until you're comfortable with rank tracking and page mapping, then look at some optimization suggestions. It's now even better when combined with the keyword tool.

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

How to increase retail traffic? [#ChartoftheDay]

Which are the best options to increase reach for online retail sites?

The answers to these key questions for online retailers are revealed in the Custora Ecommerce Pulse which summarises online retail sales sources by channel.

Although retailers will know their current mix of traffic which is driving sales, it's always useful to benchmark this mix against others. This chart gives the latest data from 2016 to inform your strategy into 2017. If you are under-performing in some channels, this benchmark enables you to compare to see what is possible.

If you apply the 70-20-10 rule, this chart shows that 70% of your effort should go into the 3 main channels or organic search, paid search or CPC and Email marketing. Affiliate marketing is also important.

When interpreting this source, it's worth remembering that these stats don't show traffic sources for acquisition only, it's for all sales, so also includes existing customers. This explains why Email marketing is so high - it's an important sales drivers from existing customers (and also new prospects)

• Source: Custora Ecomerce Pulse


• Research sample: Primary data from actual sales amongst larger US retailers using Custora Pulse - Last click


• Relevant toolkit: Learn more about increasing reach for Ecommerce through the lifecycle using our Online retail marketing toolkit

3 Eye-Opening Techniques to Wake Up Your Readers with Your First Sentence

“I was only four years old when I saw my mother load up a washing machine for the very first time in her life …”

That is global health and data expert Hans Rosling's opening line of a 2010 TED Talk, as he stands on stage with a bundle of laundry and a washing machine. Rosling does what the best presenters in the world excel at; in a matter of seconds, they get and keep your attention.

When you write content, your job is similar to someone standing on stage. Your readers are distracted and you have mere seconds to get their attention.

To grab and keep your audience's attention, it's best to use at least one attention-grabbing method that yanks your readers into your articles by creating intense curiosity.

Want to know three methods I recommend? Keep reading …

3 ways to hook your readers

In this article, I'll present the following three attention-grabbing techniques, with examples of how they can be used in your content:

• Method #1: Story of a demonstration


• Method #2: Case study


• Method #3: Opposing stance

Method #1: Story of a demonstration

Notice how this article started with a description of Hans Rosling standing on stage.

And what was he doing on stage? He was holding a bundle of laundry while standing next to a washing machine. He then proceeds to talk about the process of washing clothes. While he goes about the demonstration, your eyes are riveted to what he's going to do next.

Rosling is lucky - he's on stage and can do a physical demonstration. But when you write an article, you have to tell a story about a demonstration instead.

To do this, roll out your story as if the audience were watching and listening to find out what happens next. When you use a “demonstration” to start an article, the most mundane actions come to life.

Let's say I wrote:

“Have you ever tried to peel a clove of garlic before? If you've done it the old-fashioned way, you've probably taken five minutes or more to separate the cloves, cut each clove in half, and peel off the skin. But what if you could peel the garlic in 10 seconds? Here's what to do: Hit the garlic with the base of your palm so the cloves separate. Then take the separated cloves, put them in a container and cover it with another container. Then shake the heck out of the garlic and - like magic - the garlic is peeled.”

In the example above, you followed along, didn't you?

Not only did you follow along, you wanted to know what came next.

When you use a story that involves a demonstration, you pull the reader through your content. Then once you've gotten to the end of your story, you simply connect it to the rest of your article.

Rosling's washing machine demonstration may seem like a mundane example, but when placed at the start of an article, it forces you to follow along to find out what happens next.

A demonstration is only one way to get your readers' attention. The second is a case study.

Method #2: Case study

Did you know Airbnb was suffering as a company until Barry Manilow's drummer became a customer?

Sound interesting? Case studies - whether historical or current - attract readers because they want to know what happens next and why things unfolded the way they did.

Why was Airbnb in trouble in the first place? What's the weird connection between Airbnb and Barry Manilow's drummer? And how does all of this connect to the rest of the article?

As the Airbnb story goes, the founders were keen to offer accommodations similar to bed and breakfasts. That required the owner to be around when a guest arrived and stay in the house or apartment as well. But Barry Manilow's drummer didn't want just a room; he wanted an entire apartment.

That was a pivotal moment for Airbnb. And here's the connection to the rest of the article:

We often formulate our own ideas when clients have much better suggestions for how we can run our businesses. By listening to their real customers, Airbnb found a way to offer lodging that has broad appeal.

See how the story got your attention? Remember how the washing machine demonstration kept you riveted?

Well, there's one more method. It's called the “opposing stance.”

Method #3: Opposing stance

An opposing stance is when you present an argument that seems to conflict with your own headline.

Let's say you're writing an article on “how to learn quickly.” In the first paragraph, you would offer a point of opposition.

You could deride “speed reading” and talk about how reading faster merely exposes you to more information, rather than creating a lasting understanding of the topic you're reading about.

You'll then explain that while slowing down and taking notes may seem time-consuming, it's the most efficient way to retain what you've learned.

You teach your audience “how to learn quickly” - it's just different from what they might be expecting to hear, so it wakes them up and gets them to focus on your content.

Keep your audience fascinated

Hans Rosling speaks about global health and data. They're complex topics that audiences might have trouble connecting to, but Rosling's speeches are adored by the public. And there's a good reason why - he'll use demonstrations, case studies, and even the power of opposition in a single speech.

He'll start off with one concept, then move his way through the information and bring up the other elements - forcing you to pay rapt attention.

Great speakers know that the audience is restless. They know the previous speaker may have bored them out of their minds with graphs and endless facts and figures. That's why they use stories, case studies, and opposition.

So, when you write, take a cue from a great speaker to keep your readers absorbed as you take them through the rest of your article.

Which attention-grabbing techniques do you use in your writing?

Share in the comments below.

The post 3 Eye-Opening Techniques to Wake Up Your Readers with Your First Sentence appeared first on Copyblogger.